Peer Review
Peer review means that students evaluate the work of their peers, usually based on criteria provided by the teacher. Students first submit their own work and then review the work of one or more classmates. It is recommended to use a rubric in peer review assignments.
Reflection
Peer review encourages students to reflect on a classmate’s work using guidelines provided by the teacher, for example in a rubric. It also helps them understand how their own work may be viewed by others. Peer review is generally intended as part of the learning process rather than as part of formal assessment or the final grade.
Deeper understanding
Peer review can deepen students’ understanding of the assignment criteria. They are exposed to different perspectives and interpretations and can use this to improve their own work.
Improving the assignment
The main purpose of peer review is for students to help one another improve, rather than for their reviews to count toward a grade. Students are expected to give comments that support their peers and help them strengthen their work. Peer review can therefore be a valuable step before the final submission that is assessed by the teacher.
It is important that the teacher explains clearly what the peer review involves, what students are expected to evaluate, and how they should do it. Students should also be given clear criteria to use in their review, for example through a rubric.
It is also helpful to give students guidance on respectful communication. They should be encouraged to be polite, constructive, and specific, for example by first pointing out what works well before suggesting what could be improved or made clearer.
It is useful to explain the difference between feedback and grading. Grading is used to judge work on a scale, such as 0–10, and usually contributes to the final grade. Feedback, by contrast, is intended to help students improve their work.
About peer review in a Canvas assignment
Peer review is enabled in a standard Canvas assignment. See: Assignments.
Student evaluations of assignments do not count toward the grade. The assignment is expected to be graded by the teacher, although, like other assignments, it may be set to have no weight in the final grade.
Teachers can review peer review results in SpeedGrader while giving grades and feedback.
Once a student has saved an assessment in a rubric, they cannot change their rubric ratings, which can be difficult if they make a mistake.
Canvas does not handle peer review in group assignments well unless the teacher assigns the peer reviews manually, which can be time-consuming. If Canvas is allowed to assign peer reviews automatically in a group assignment, a student who is supposed to review two submissions may be assigned the work of two students from the same group and therefore end up reviewing the same group assignment twice.
Self-assessment can also be enabled (in the rubric).
After grades have been posted, students can view both peer reviews and the teacher’s assessment.
Group assignments
For group assignments, or work done in pairs, it is generally better to use peer review in FeedbackFruits.
Peer review in discussions
Peer review is also available in discussions.
FeedbackFruits
See the instructions for Peer Review in FeedbackFruits.
Students evaluate the contribution of group members
This is not peer review in the usual sense, since students are not submitting work to be reviewed. Instead, they evaluate the contribution of members of their group. For this, it is more appropriate to use the FeedbackFruits tool Group Member Evaluation.
Learn more about Peer Review in Canvas Assignment:
- How do I use peer review assignments in a course?
- How do I create a peer review assignment?
- How do I manually assign peer reviews for an assignment?
- How do I automatically assign peer reviews for an assignment?
- How do I view student peer review comments as an instructor?
Comparison of Peer Evaluation Tools: FeedbackFruits, Canvas, and Turnitin.
Center for Teaching Innovation and Canvas@Cornell, Cornell University.
